Scientific American gives up!

S E E Quine at “Science, wackmobiles, and spurious brainchildren” quotes a Scientific American editiorial (April, 2005) in which they promise to give fair and equal treatment to Intelligent Design.

In retrospect, this magazine’s coverage of so-called evolution has been hideously one-sided…. Where were the answering articles presenting the powerful case for scientific creationism? Why were we so unwilling to suggest that dinosaurs lived 6,000 years ago or that a cataclysmic flood carved the Grand Canyon? Blame the scientists. They dazzled us with their fancy fossils, their radiocarbon dating and their tens of thousands of peer-reviewed journal articles. As editors, we had no business being persuaded by mountains of evidence.

Moreover, we shamefully mistreated the Intelligent Design (ID) theorists by lumping them in with creationists. Creationists believe that God designed all life, and that’s a somewhat religious idea. But ID theorists think that at unspecified times some unnamed superpowerful entity designed life, or maybe just some species, or maybe just some of the stuff in cells. That’s what makes ID a superior scientific theory: it doesn’t get bogged down in details.

Enjoy the whole article by clicking the link below.


One Response to “Scientific American gives up!”

  1. S E E Quine Says:

    ` I love you! ^^

    ` …Er… you know, because you acknowledged my blog’s existence on your blog, and since your blog rocks, it’s an honor of sorts!

    ` Squeeee! *dances out into the night, disturbing the peace*

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: