Now here’s a good book!

I’d like to read this one.

Who needs Simplified Technical English?

Over at Clever Hamster, there’s a description of Simplified Technical English and what it’s good for.

Simplified Technical English is a writing standard created for aerospace/defense maintenance documentation, born of a deadly need for clarity (such as the worker who obediently “cut the power” with loppers and died). It’s a controlled language because it restricts grammar, style, and vocabulary. Its goal is to stamp out ambiguity (one word = one meaning) and present technical complexity in the easiest language possible, to support users of diverse ages, abilities, and familiarity with English.

Can you sue God’s publishers?

Gay man sues Bible’s publishers for causing harassment: Powell’s book blog, Monday, Item 3.

Bradley LaShawn Fowler, 39, has filed lawsuits in a Michigan federal court against Zondervan Publishing and Thomas Nelson Inc., claiming some editions of the Bibles those companies put out specifically declare homosexuality to be sinful, which has led him to suffer discrimination, emotional pain and mental instability.

[...] The suit against Zondervan cites a specific passage of the company’s 1982 and 1987 editions, 1 Corinthians 6:9:

“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral no idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders.”

Fowler claims the term “homosexual” was edited out of the 1989 and 1994 editions.

In addition to campaigning to get the churches’ free tax ride rescinded (why pay their salaries so they can insult us?), maybe we can make this a class action suit. And one for women.

Currently reading: “Microcosm” by Carl Zimmer

Microcosm by Carl Zimmer

I’ve started to read Carl Zimmer’s latest book, Microcosm, and learned many fascinating facts about the bacterium. For the first few chapters, Zimmer is reviewing the history of research on bacteria and DNA. He mentioned that Oswald Avery, a microbiologist at the Rockefeller Institute, was the first to prove that DNA was the material of heredity and genes; that the food-poisoning bacterium Shigella is really just a strain of Escherichia coli; and that E. coli itself is more comples\x and individual than we dreamed of.

Haldane’s Precambrian Puzzle from The Flying Trilobite

Glendon Mellow at The Flying Trilobite shows us a piece of art that could be a puzzle arranged in two different ways: as ordinary fossils and as Haldane’s impossible Jurassic rabbit. Take a look at Haldane’s Precambrian Puzzle.

Go, go GECCO!

If you’re reading this, you’re missing GECCO: The Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference for 2008, Saturday to Wednesday, July 12 - 16. It’s in Atlanta, Georgia. If I weren’t on a contract right now… I’ll bet it will be a lot of fun, even if I couldn’t understand the most rarefied and technical papers.

GECCO conference

GECCO conference

When cats help you cook

cat
more funny cat pictures

Recipes are a common example of writing a procedure. What makes a good recipe makes a good procedure. It states

  • Expected results: serves 4, low-fat, children like it
  • When to use it: you’re in a hurry or you have the oven on anyway
  • Requirements: preparation time 20 minutes, cooking time 1 hour
  • Materials needed: list of ingredients and how they’re prepared (e.g. chopped or sifted)
  • Actions in order: steps in chronological order for best result: preheat oven, then mix dry ingredients.
  • How to know when you’re done: golden around the edges

When you think about writing a procedure, don’t be intimidated: think of it as a recipe for results.

My books have arrived!

My latest batch of books has arrived, after Amazon promised to ship them August 11th. They are

Do you notice a trend there? I’m treating myself to some of the best science writing on the planet, that of Carl Zimmer.

The last book is fiction, an alternate history of the Napoleonic Wars in which dragons provide air support as a branch of the Navy. This is the fifth book of the series. Start with Temeraire.

Be a freelance illustrator

Statistically Improbable Phrases has a good article on “How to be a freelance illustrator.” First bit of advice:

Get a website. I can’t consider anyone who isn’t online. I’m sorry, that seems harsh, but I physically do not have time to spend an hour going to a coffee shop and shuffling through the portfolio of each of the dozens of illustrators I hear about. I need to see all your work in about 30 seconds, then move on to the next candidate.

In other words, make it easy to find you.

Create a cartoon character using Adobe Illustrator

cartoon fish

The Spoon Graphics blog has a step-by-step tutorial showing you how to create a 2-D character, starting with a sketch and adding realistic pen strokes, then texture, and shading. I’m impressed with creating a new pen tool to provide variable-width lines: How to create your own vector cartoon character.

The Loom & Bad Astronomy move to Discover

Discover magazine has bagged two notable blogs: Science writer Carl Zimmer’s The Loom and astronomer & science writer Phil Plait’s Bad Astronomy.

Carl started out at Discover and he’s back there with a monthly column. He’s an excellent writer: I just ordered three more of his books for myself. Visit him at The Loom.

I’m not as familiar with Phil Plait, but he’s a working astronomer & educator who has struck out on his own as
a science writer, and a darn good one. Visit him at Bad Astronomy.

There’s a wiki in my future

My latest contract assignment is as part of a team writing Help Desk training materials for dozens of legacy applications served over a wide-area network and used by different companies in the newspaper publishing business. After much debate, the project managers settled on a wiki–web-based, collaboratively written pages– for developing and delivering content. Everything from the first draft will be online, available for review. Later, it will be updated by the users themselves as they gain expertise. It’s going to be interesting!

Expelled crawls into Canada

Expelled Exposed

The notorious creationist movie has crawled over the border into Canada and garnered a few reviews.

The Straight:

Truth begins and ends with the title of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a semislick advertorial for “intelligent design”, the sanitized public mask of creationism, itself invented by Christians who think their God is too stupid to have come up with evolution on his own….

Various cranks, allegedly fired from academia for their outrageous anti-Darwinist queries, give the usual freedom-of-speech spiels. (The genuine questions raised here have to do more with the notion of tenure than science, but that’s too subtle for movie palaver.) And leading evolutionary thinker and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins—seen in several interviews—only gradually recognizes that he is being set up.

The National Post, “Science is not Philosophy,” by John Moore

Expelled is at its most risible when it tries to establish a direct line from Darwin to eugenics and genocide. Stein quotes from a passage in Darwin’s writing that appears to endorse the notion that for a species to thrive the infirm must be culled. He omits the part where Darwin insists this would be “evil” and that man’s care for the weak is “the noblest part of our nature.”…

The core of the religious complaint against evolution rests on a false syllogism: Darwin leads automatically to atheism which leads to a world without moral order; therefore science is the enemy of God. It’s a maddening false supposition because while scientists are free to believe in God (and an estimated 40% do) science itself remains neutral…

…just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean everyone isn’t out to get you. It is equally true that when everyone insists you are wrong about something it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re engaged in an elaborate conspiracy. You could just be wrong.

The National Post, “Nature vs. nurture vs. Nikita Khrushchev,” by Chris Knight:

apparently lacking any decent footage of Darwinists in their natural (and naturally selected) environment, it uses old black-and-white clips of cops with billy clubs, schoolyard bullies, Berlin Wall builders, guillotine operators and (my favourite) Nikita Khrushchev banging a shoe. The message is clear: If you think life evolved from the primordial soup, you’re in some pretty bad company.

Expelled goes on to make the argument that Darwinism was a necessary though not sufficient condition for Nazi Germany — which, even if true, is like saying that having two arms is necessary though not sufficient to strangle someone; and I stand by my right to bare arms. Nonetheless, this spurious leap of logic lets the filmmakers unleash a torrent of Nazi newsreel footage. (Apparently, Darwinists can be both Communists and Fascists at the same time.)

Intelligent Design is not synonymous with the six-days-and-then-He rested liturgy of creationism, but it’s not far off. Proponents believe life is too complex to have arisen randomly, and the universe too unlikely for it to be a chance occurrence. (Although if life hadn’t arisen, we wouldn’t be making films about how unlikely it is.) DNA is a program, they contend, so where’s the programmer? Unfortunately, any theory that rests on the axiom “Well, somebody must have made all this!” lacks a certain scientific rigour, never mind experimental validation.

A few other fallacies are worth mentioning. Just because a scientist holds a belief doesn’t automatically make that belief scientific. And just because a theory is framed in scientific language doesn’t necessarily give it equal status with opposing viewpoints. The flat-vs.-round-Earth debate, for instance, doesn’t take place on a level playing field because one of the theories is wrong…..

Ultimately, however, what sinks Expelled is not bad science but bad filmmaking.

For more about the movie, visit Expelled.

Andy Schafly abuses the law

Submitted to a Candid World points out that Conservapaedia editor Andy Schafly is threatening to start a civil law suit knowing that it is completely without merit: Andy Schafly and dirty lawyering.

Conservapedia’s mortal enemy, RationalWiki, posted a side-by-side, point-by-point refutation of one of Conservapedia’s articles. The RationalWiki refutation article obviously included Conservapedia content, and employed it towards the end of comparison and criticism, which is clearly fair use within United States copyright law. When Andy saw RationalWiki’s article, though, and its appropriation and critique, he threatened to sue, asserting that his “copyright” on the Conservapedia material was infringed by its reproduction and critique. To say that Andy was wrong is to understate the point: it’s unclear whether Conservapedia, an open-source encyclopedia, even has a copyright, and even if it did, copying to critique is clearly fair use. Andy’s position was so wrong that he could not have even entertained the possibility that he was right. He threatened civil litigation knowing the law wasn’t on his side, hoping his legally unsophisticated opponent didn’t know enough to fight him. Threatening civil litigation in bad faith is bad enough; using a bad faith threat to exploit a legally unsophisticated party is even worse.

This is interesting, because I’ve known of lawyers who will send a letter on behalf of a landlord telling renters that the property has been sold and telling them to move out. In fact, the Landlord & Tenant act in Ontario explicitly states that sale of the property is not grounds for evicting a tenant: the property must be sold with a sitting tenant. But many renters don’t know that and feel forced to move out. Should I report them to the Law Society?

Geek humor: opacity

Opacity:

humorous pictures

more funny cat pictures