Comments on: Who’s zoomin’ who? http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/ Science news and opinions, culture wars, humor, oddities, personal notes Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:32:10 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Like something turned on a lathe « Science Notes http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/#comment-1594 Like something turned on a lathe « Science Notes Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:34:41 +0000 http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/?p=2242#comment-1594 [...] Comments Like something turne… on Who’s zoomin’…monado on Tangled Bank #112AJ Milne on Panda rips off man’s…AJ Milne on Panda rips [...] [...] Comments Like something turne… on Who’s zoomin’…monado on Tangled Bank #112AJ Milne on Panda rips off man’s…AJ Milne on Panda rips [...]

]]> By: Like something turned on a lathe « Science Notes http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/#comment-1593 Like something turned on a lathe « Science Notes Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:34:06 +0000 http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/?p=2242#comment-1593 [...] Who's Zoomin' Who? [...] [...] Who’s Zoomin’ Who? [...]

]]> By: monado http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/#comment-1182 monado Thu, 08 May 2008 22:51:43 +0000 http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/?p=2242#comment-1182 Feel free! It just occurred to me that Dembski isn't playing fair. "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Feel free! It just occurred to me that Dembski isn’t playing fair. “What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.”

]]> By: slpage http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/#comment-1178 slpage Thu, 08 May 2008 19:18:49 +0000 http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/?p=2242#comment-1178 This is actually a very good argument. So good in fact that I am going to use it myself (giving credit where due, of course). This is actually a very good argument.

So good in fact that I am going to use it myself (giving credit where due, of course).

]]> By: Tangled Bank #104 :: Dammit Jim! http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/whos-zoomin-who/#comment-1130 Tangled Bank #104 :: Dammit Jim! Thu, 01 May 2008 15:58:49 +0000 http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/?p=2242#comment-1130 [...] Moving on to scheming of the creationist sort, Greg theorizes why physics doesn’t have argumentum ad Nazium documentaries and points out that biology at the molecular scale is difficult to comprehend. Monado gives an example of this difficulty by comparing creationist drawings to a real electron micrograph of a flagellum. [...] [...] Moving on to scheming of the creationist sort, Greg theorizes why physics doesn’t have argumentum ad Nazium documentaries and points out that biology at the molecular scale is difficult to comprehend. Monado gives an example of this difficulty by comparing creationist drawings to a real electron micrograph of a flagellum. [...]

]]>